Not commenting. Just showing the thread. Wow.
Union Square at 60% IRR across 8 funds wow omg pic.twitter.com/vJ2HgFm3qE
— Jason ✨Loved SaaStrEuropa✨ Lemkin 🦄 (@jasonlk) June 16, 2019
Pretty cool to see them doing this.
Atlassian is releasing a document that’s meant to simplify the negotiation of terms for acquisitions. That way the buyer and seller can focus on more important topics, like integration.
Yup. It’s slow. I would say though that outright folds come fast but that companies could be barely surviving but not going under for years.
I also concur with the payback period.
Calling all SEAsian founders and angels…
Unsafe Notes – AVC
— Read on avc.com/2019/05/unsafe-notes/
Fantastic read – it’s great to see someone calling it like it is. KP blew apart.
Very in depth – I have not read it all but plan to dive in.
Some great stuff in this issue.
This I think about a lot especially in the context of SEAsia:
4/ Finally, I was struck by how all the companies mentioned in the “bubble” pieces – often in reaction to the sticker shock of what seemed like a large valuation back then – went on to bigger and bigger valuations as time went on, often many times over. Which leads me to wonder:
a) why did so many commentators miss the growth that was going to happen to these companies?
b) is the same mistake being made now in the narrative around valuations?
Now I want this book :: Loonshots.
I am still struggling to like OA. 😉
Long one – still reading. Always interesting stuff from Ray and plenty to learn.
More from the Verge :: https://www.theverge.com/2019/4/5/18297619/amazon-eero-price-fire-sale-mesh-wi-fi-buyout
Not all exits are exits. 😉
Hardware is hard.
Now on to the mechanics.
Hard to know all the specifics but this is a common tactic when a large company acquires a smaller one. One way to buy something is pay enough money for it that all the investors, employees and founders make money. This could be a considered a normal deal but when a company isn’t doing well and owes money then lots of other things could happen.
What the deal looks like is Amazon paid just enough to get a deal approved and then incentivized the founders to take a lower overall price but made it up to them in their new employee deal. VC’s are pretty aware of this and early stage paperwork is sometimes drafted that tries to deal with this but in later stages an exit is sometimes an exit.
Looks like only real early investors made some money and the core team getting spiffed to stay at Amazon will do okay.
A bunch of other investors and even worse, employees are getting screwed. Looks like some employees will have paid for their options and have nothing but losses to show for it. Options can be wicked, especially in the USA – where one could even being paying AMT on their options but never realize a gain.
The way the USA deals with options sucks since the core premise is they can tax you on unrealized gains. Painful.
Again – I don’t know the specifics but if the founders or core execs are eventually going to be minted and a bunch of rank & file got screwed – that’s bad. But let’s be honest. Lay that blame on the founders – not Amazon or the VC’s since the founders ultimately accept the deal and they can negotiate or even give their pool or bonuses to the rank and file. That’s at their discretion.
Startups are hard and this is probably a more normal story than the ones of glorious riches and fame that we always seem to hear about.
Their new move is intense.
And so Andreessen and Horowitz, who rank 55th and 73rd, respectively, on this year’s Forbes Midas List, intend to be disagreeable themselves. They just finished raising a soon-to-be announced $2 billion fund (bringing total assets under management to nearly $10 billion) to write even bigger checks for portfolio companies and unicorns the firm missed the first time. More aggressively, they tell Forbes that they are registering their entire firm—all 150 people—as financial advisors, renouncing Andreessen Horowitz’s status as a venture capital firm entirely.
Why? Well, venture capitalists have long traded a lack of Wall Street-style oversight for the promise that they invest mainly in new shares of private companies. It was a tradeoff firms gladly made—until the age of crypto, a type of high-risk investment the SEC says requires more oversight. So be it, says Andreessen Horowitz. By renouncing its venture capital status, it’ll be able to go deeper on riskier bets: If the firm wants to put $1 billion into cryptocurrency or tokens, or buy unlimited shares in public companies or from other investors, it can. And in doing so, the thinking goes, it’ll again make other firms feel like they have one hand tied behind their back.